NEC Corp. v. Peloton Interactive Inc.
Baker Botts LLP
NEC Corporation
Graphics Consulting & Design, Evidence Presentation
Gilimex Inc. v. Amazon.com Services LLC
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Amazon
Trial Strategy, Graphics Consulting & Design, Evidence Presentation
Augenbaum v. Anson Investments Master Fund LP, et al.
Freshfields, Ellenoff Grossman & Schole
Empery Asset Management, Brio Capital
Jury Research, Jury Selection, Witness Preparation, Trial Strategy, Graphics Consulting & Design, Evidence Presentation
Lively v. Wayfarer, et al.
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips
Blake Lively
Trial Strategy, Jury Research, Graphics Consulting & Design, Evidence Presentation
Patrick Byrne v. Ameris Bank
Allen Matkins
Patrick Byrne
Trial Strategy, Jury Research, Graphics Consulting & Design, Evidence Presentation
Actava TV, Inc. v. Joint Stock Company “Channel One Russia Worldwide”
Foley Hoag
Actava TV
Graphics Consulting, Evidence Presentation
The City of Baltimore v. Hanover Armory, LLC
Sanford Heisler
The City of Baltimore
Graphics Consulting, Multimedia Design, Evidence Presentation
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company v. Monte Carlo, LLC., et al.
Farrell Fritz P.C.
Monte Carlo LLC
Graphics Consulting & Design, Evidence Presentation
Waldner v. Natixis Investment Managers LP, et al.
Goodwin Procter
Natixis Investment Managers LP
Graphics Consulting & Design, Evidence Presentation
Purple Buyer Holdings LLC v. Taylor, et al.
Wachtell Lipton
Purple Buyer Holdings LLC
Graphics Development, Trial Preparation, Evidence Presentation
The jury found that Peloton directly infringed four asserted patent claims and rejected Peloton's invalidity defense.
Halfway through 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is balancing an active Section 337 docket with meaningful changes in its leadership. Investigations continue to move on demanding schedules as the Commission welcomes new members and prepares for a change on its Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) bench.
The U.S. International Trade Commission is entering an important period of transition. Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) MaryJoan McNamara's planned departure has prompted the Commission to begin searching for her successor, while the Commission itself is also welcoming new leadership as the Senate advances a full slate of commissioner nominees.
Artificial intelligence is no longer a theoretical issue in litigation. Law firms are developing AI policies, courts have issued guidance on attorney use of generative AI, and litigants are increasingly encountering AI-generated work during discovery. More recently, attention has begun to shift to another question: what happens when expert witnesses incorporate AI into their work?
Companies are investing enormous resources into developing proprietary algorithms, manufacturing processes, engineering designs, training data, source code, and other confidential information that often cannot be protected through patents alone.
The verdict, $4.2m in compensatory damages and $100m in punitive damages, sends a powerful message to the ghost gun industry.
To better understand where AI litigation is headed, we asked members of DOAR's AI Expert Team to share their perspectives on the disputes emerging today, the technical issues likely to shape future cases, and what organizations should be doing to prepare.
Success at the ITC depends not just on the legal merits, but on how effectively parties can organize technical complexity, align expert-driven narratives, and present a clear, disciplined case under significant time pressure. Let’s explore how venue nuances and current industry trends are impacting proceedings seen before the Commission.