Filtered By: Natalie Gordon

Procedural Justice: Jurors’ Views of the Fairness of the Legal System

| Natalie Gordon |
Imagine that your football team makes it to the Superbowl, but only because a referee made a bad call in the previous game that determined who would advance to the championship (hint: Superbowl 2019). You might have conflicted feelings: Happiness about your team, but concerns about the ease of breaching the fairness of the whole […]

Anecdotes are to analogies as…

| Natalie Gordon |
What makes for an effective anecdote? In health research, good anecdotes are considered an exercise in generalization: “We have generalized from the data to the anecdote; we can generalize from the anecdote about the data and generalize to other contexts and populations.”[1] Applying this to a trial setting, your party’s narrative or case theme might […]

Information Contamination in Bifurcated Trials: Friend or Foe?

| Natalie Gordon |
Do you want the good news or the bad news first? We are all familiar with this phrase, and when we use it, it is because we are hoping the bad news will be mitigated by the good news. In other words, we want the positive feeling from the good news to spill over and […]

Who Got the Ball Rolling? Jurors and Causal Chains

| Natalie Gordon |
When Donald Trump was elected president in 2016, many Americans asked—how did this happen?  Some attributed it to James Comey’s decision to re-open the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s e-mails just days earlier, while others looked farther back in time to Trump’s success on the Apprentice.  This investigation into what led Trump to become President exemplifies […]

The trial consultants trusted by the nation’s leading trial lawyers.